This was such a brazen display of entitlement and incompetence that even the pundits at CNN a network that aired Trump rallies uninterrupted reacted with slack-jawed horror. Except for Jeffrey Lord.
Who are the real fanatics — women who cover at the beach, or the government that orders them to strip? Introduced and with an afterword by Kevin BarrettVeterans Today Editor Mainstream media, academia — the whole dominant discourse, really — tell us that secularists are the reasonable people, whereas religious folk tend to be fundamentalist, irrational, potentially extremist crazies.
But is that really the case? Or is the dominant Western secularist worldview itself permeated with intolerance, fanaticism and irrationality? That book also features a great essay along similar lines by Thaddeus Kozinksi. As Christianity gained the upper hand, many people who were formerly Muslims or Jews decided to become Christians.
However, it was widely believed that many most? Now, when you look at this problem in a more general way, it is hardly unique to 15th century Spain.
Thus, it stands to reason that, had things turned out differently, with a Muslim victory, many Christians would have converted to Islam, and in that case, by and large, those conversions would have been about as sincere as the ones that actually did happen in the other direction.
Moreover, the basic principle operating here does not apply solely to religious affiliation, but to any ideology or set of dogmas that becomes dominant. So we can safely reason that not everybody who was a member of the communist party in the Soviet Union really believed in the communist ideology.
Granted, you had your true believers, the real fanatics, but also plenty of people who proclaimed their belief and joined the Party because it was the expedient thing to do. Here is a fascinating video snippet from a talk given by the award-winning journalist Jeremy Scahill.
This video snippet is only a minute long, but it is such a bizarre piece of doubletalk or even triple-talk that I think it is worth examining in detail. It is simply fascinating to see all the mental gymnastics that Scahill goes through in less than a minute. Scahill begins by simply affirming his faith in the official story.
He really sounds like somebody reciting scripture. But his response does not end there. So, at the 0: But his response does not end there either.
Because this is what expected of him.
So now he completely shifts register, using this kind of language: That, he has already said, was Al Qaeda!
But, then, after saying this sentence, I guess he realizes that he just insulted the person who asked him the question and probably some significant part of the audience as well and, my sense is that Scahill is the kind of person who wants to come off as a nice guy, to be liked, so he tries to backtrack a little and says: One thing that occurs to me about all of this is that, surely this is somehow very typical of the modern age we live in.
Just try to imagine Torquemada going through all these contortions: I get the feeling that, in a way, the Spanish Inquisition was much more honest and forthright than modern-day intellectual gatekeepers. For purposes of contrast, I wanted to compare a similar video clip of Torquemada, but for some reason, I could not find any.
So this will have to do: Well, you see, Scahill has a problem that somebody like Torquemada would not have. Like Torquemada, he must vigorously condemn the heretics: Torquemada would not have that problem.
In fact, he probably revels in the fact that unlike Scahill he is one scary dude and people are quite justifiably terrified of him. Hmm… Damned if I know.
In 15th century Spain, there were very strong reasons to suspect that many declarations of Christian faith were not being made sincerely, but how could one ever tell for sure?
Once he was tarred as a heretic conspiracy theorist, he would be effectively excommunicated banned.
His charmed existence would largely come to an end and life would definitely become quite a bit more difficult for Jeremy.
Well, I would venture to say that, at the very least, he is far less certain of the Al Qaeda story than he is representing. What somebody in that position understands is that he simply must express his firm belief in the official story.
Modern-day Religious Intolerance While the Spanish Inquisition stands out in our collective consciousness as a horrific example of religious intolerance, it did happen a good while ago. Let me now share an anecdote that is far more typical of modern Spanish society than Torquemada or the Inquisition.
R recounted to me an incident that occurred with his sister, a conversation in which R stated his opposition to same-sex marriage.The Protestant Reformation Lasted Theology Religion Essay Attitudes Was The Black Death Theology Religion Essay Fundamentalist: the Fine Line Between Religion and Cult Essay.
How to Walk the Fine Line Between Helping and Hovering.
Is Trump Just Another Toxic Cult Leader? local town halls; and, oh, yeah, Meryl Streep, into the ranks of the suppressed. Elitist enemies all of them. In an essay explaining Trump’s popularity with fundamentalist and evangelical voters.
An Essay on Fundamentalism, Tolerance and Hypocrisy. Authors; Authors and affiliations; Theo W. A. de Wit; Open Access.
There is a very fine line, and sometimes no line at all, between removing religion from the public battlefield Multiculturalism then boils down to a cult of contact-shunning, of an enforced silence amongst various. Religion as a Cult What is the difference between a cult and a religion? Some of the earliest forms of religion, dating back to the beginnings of humanity and conceptual thinking, first appeared as cults.
Exclusivism is a religion that believes their religion is the only way of the truth and no other religion is above them. A pluralism religion is the acknowledgment that all religions are equal, all practices are valid and no religion is greater than another.
Religion Is an Old Cult; and a Cult is a New Religion Biography Online put it rather shortly, but still quite pointedly, when they said that "A religion is an old cult. A cult is a new religious movement.".