Marker and Kathi Hamlon One of the most important public policy debates today surrounds the issues of euthanasia and assisted suicide. The outcome of that debate will profoundly affect family relationships, interaction between doctors and patients, and concepts of basic ethical behavior. With so much at stake, more is needed than a duel of one-liners, slogans and sound bites.
Does every citizen have a "right to die" at a time of choice? Every right includes a choice. The right to speech does not remove the option to remain silent; the right to vote brings with it the right to abstain.
In the same way, the right to choose to die is implicit in the right to life. Opponents of euthanasia erroneously argue that human death is always wrong; exceptions exist. It is acceptable to take a life in self-defense.
It is acceptable to send soldiers into war to die and kill to achieve certain ends. It is acceptable to risk human life in missions into space.
And, it is considered acceptable by some actually many conservatives that oppose euthanasia to execute criminals. Clearly, life is not inviolable in modern society. It can be violated or risked for certain, highly valuable ends security, justice, discovery.
The question with euthanasia, therefore, is not whether life can be violated for certain ends it can. The question is whether it can be a justified trade-off, and if so, how to ensure that euthanasia is only performed when it is fully justified under the criteria we set forth.
Right to die allows opponents to not participate. Allowing the right to die means that opponents can still exercise their rights by choosing not to particpate, whereas refusing this right disenfranchises those who may want to choose the time and manner of their death without harming others.
Therefore allowing this right is more democratic. Sanctity-of-life ideologies trample the lives of the dying that call for euthanasia.
If we were to assume that euthanasia is wrong, than we would also have to assume that the pleas of the dying for euthanasia are wrong too. Can we disregard these pleas as merely the dying wishes of individuals that have become desperate and irrational? If we disregard these pleas, aren't we essentially telling the dying that their wishes are wrong and, in fact, immoral?
That is, in effect, what opponents of euthanasia are saying to the dying that make these pleas. At a minimum, the state is simply denying individuals their dying wish, angering, and even alienating them.
Is this a good way for the state to honor the dying and their lives?
In this way, denying euthanasia violates the sanctity of the lives of the dying that call for it. Aren't these the only sanctified lives at hand that matter?
Or, is the purpose to walk all over the dying in order to uphold a self-righteous belief among the living about the "sanctity of life". This is not the general euthanasia proposal, which is to allow patients with exceptional circumstances to seek euthanasia and receive it if they are eligible.
The choice is in the hands of the patient, not the family or doctors, so it cannot be termed "killing". Rather, its about helping terminal patients die who want to die.Nov 05, · Physician-assisted suicide is not a right.
his arguments do not enlighten the discussion about enhancing end-of-life care. The writer is the author of “A Time to Mourn” and teaches a. In the United States, Dr Jack Kervorkian – nicknamed ‘Doctor Death’ for his actions beliefs – has campaigned for a change in the law for many years, and assisted in the suicide of at least 45 people.
Those who promote doctor-prescribed suicide point to Oregon’s experience with assisted suicide under that state’s “Death with Dignity Law.” They claim that years of official reports from that state prove that abuses and problems do not occur.
Physician-assisted death: the practice of a physician providing the means for a person with decision-making capacity to take his or own life, usually with a prescription for barbiturates that patient takes himself or herself; sometimes also called physician-assisted suicide, physician aid-in-dying, and patient administered hastened death).
In the United States, Dr Jack Kervorkian – nicknamed ‘Doctor Death’ for his actions beliefs – has campaigned for a change in the law for many years, and assisted in the suicide of at least 45 people. When Death is Sought.
Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia in a Medical Context The Ethical Debate. Chapter 5 - The Ethical Debate has been the discussion of assisted suicide and euthanasia in the medical and ethical literature.
In this debate, some assert that both assisted suicide and euthanasia are morally wrong and should not be provided.